The lyrics revolve around the concept of time and the manipulation of information through media spin. The song criticizes political figures like the President and Ayatollah, highlighting their use of deception. The repetitive phrase "What time is it? Four thirty" serves as a metaphor for the constant state of misinformation and confusion.

Read more
image

Meaning of "What Time Is It?" by Spin Doctors


The lyrics of "What Time Is It?" by Spin Doctors contain a sharp critique of political deception and media manipulation. The recurring question, "What time is it?" seems simple enough but takes on a deeper meaning within the context of the song. It becomes a symbol for the constant state of confusion and uncertainty that arises from the distorted narratives presented by those in power.

The reference to "Four thirty" implies an early hour, suggesting that the events being discussed are still unfolding. This emphasizes the idea that the truth is being obscured or covered up before a clear understanding can be obtained. The repeated line "It's not late, naw, naw, just early, early, early" reinforces the notion that the public is being deceived in the early stages of a situation, before they have a chance to fully comprehend what is happening.

The lyrics also mention the President and the Ayatollah, representing different political realms. The President "sweat[s] through his talcum," indicating that he is nervous and scrambling to control the narrative by manipulating information. The "News paper man" is compared to a falcon, suggesting that he is watchful and vigilant in his role of reporting the news. However, even the media is not immune to deception, as they use "a little English to doctor the spin," implying they manipulate the information they present to the public.

The reference to the Ayatollah and his "damn jihad" brings in the element of religious extremism. The song portrays him as "hopping mad" and jibbering, which adds a tone of ridicule. This could be interpreted as a commentary on the media's portrayal of religious conflicts, highlighting how it can be exaggerated and distorted for sensationalism.

Overall, the song serves as a critique of the manipulation of information for political purposes. It questions the trustworthiness of those in power and challenges the audience to seek truth beyond what is presented in the media.